Search for: All records

Dry and wet extremes (i.e., droughts and floods) are the costliest hydrologic hazards for infrastructure and socio-environmental systems. Being closely interconnected and interdependent extremes of the same hydrological cycle, they often occur in close succession with the potential to exacerbate hydrologic risks. However, traditionally this is ignored and both hazards are considered separately in hydrologic risk assessments; this can lead to an underestimation of critical infrastructure risks (e.g., dams, levees, dikes, and reservoirs). Here, we identify and characterize consecutive dry and wet extreme (CDW) events using the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index, assess their multi-hazard hydrologic risks employing copula models, and investigate teleconnections with large-scale climate variability. We identify hotspots of CDW events in North America, Europe, and Australia where the total numbers of CDW events range from 20 to 30 from 1901 to 2015. Decreasing trends in recovery time (i.e., time between termination of dry extreme and onset of wet extreme) and increasing trends in dry and wet extreme severities reveal the intensification of CDW events over time. We quantify that the joint exceedance probabilities of dry and wet extreme severities equivalent to 50-year and 100-year univariate return periods increase by several folds (up to 20 and 54 for 50-year and 100-year return periods, respectively) when CDW events and their associated dependence are considered compared to their independent and isolated counterparts. We find teleconnections between CDW and Niño3.4; at least 80% of the CDW events are causally linked to Niño3.4 at 50% of the grid locations across the hotspot regions. This study advances the understanding of multi-hazard hydrologic risks from CDW events and the presented results can aid more robust planning and decision-making.

Little is known about the effect of tidal changes on minor flooding in most lagoonal estuaries, often due to a paucity of historical records that predate landscape changes. In this contribution, we recover and apply archival tidal range data to show that the mean tidal range in Miami, Florida, has almost doubled since 1900, from 0.32 to 0.61 m today. A likely cause is the dredging of a ∼15 m deep, 150 m wide harbor entrance channel beginning in the early 20th century, which changed northern Biscayne Bay from a choked inlet system to one with a tidal range close to coastal conditions. To investigate the implications for high‐tide flooding, we develop and validate a tidal‐inference based methodology that leverages estimates of pre‐1900 tidal range to obtain historical tidal predictions and constituents. Next, water level predictions that represent historical and modern water level variations are projected forward in time using different sea level rise scenarios. Results show that the historical increase in tidal range hastened the occurrence of present‐day flooding, and that the total integrated number of days with high‐tide floods in the 2020–2100 period will be approximately O(10³) more under present day tides compared to pre‐development conditions. These results suggest that tidal change may be a previously under‐appreciated factor in the increasing prevalence of high‐tide flooding in lagoonal estuaries, and our methods open the door to improving our understanding of other heavily‐altered systems.